Dr. Minch PhD examined Compassion with Dr. Corbett
of the Natural History Museum in Santa Barbara, California. See: Scientist examine Compassion.
I had to say, Dr. Corbertt and Dr. Minch are the tops in their respective fields. I search the area throughly and contacted Dr. Corbett. He ask me to have Dr. Minch join the examination. This whole process was done in the most professional manner. It was made clear to me from the beginning they would offer their opinions based on the evidence they observed. At no time did they make any mention of the age of the skull or when it could have been carved. I am honored they took their time to do this examination.
The scientist took turns examining the skull. Dr. Minch, a 30 year head of the Geology dept. and Gemologist with experience in lapidary work, explained to me how difficult it was to carve quartz. He said due to the extreme hardness it is prone to fracturing. I ask about the "axis" of the skull and he held it up with the teeth pointing to the ceiling and the base of the skull on the desk. He said the skull was cut form a large crystal in this position. The original piece of quartz had fused into 3 separate layers.
Between the first two lower layer a solution of Iron Oxide had found it's way in and formed a thin layer
that was not encapsulated when all three layers cooled. Also, Dr. Minch found an air bubble about 1 mm inside the first and second layers of the original quartz crystal. It was in a liquid solution, probably water. When the skull was rocked forward and back slightly the bubble would move! This called "Enhydro" in the world of crystals.
Note: Small bubble of air in center of photo.
I showed the scientist a place on the pallet where it was not finish polished. It still had some groves and
spots of what ever material was used to do the carving. Upon examination Dr. Minch concluded the skull was carved by hand. This was due to the carver using his hands to literally "skip over" places where a machine would have cut clean. This area was a perfect example of such work. I wondered if the carver had left this like this on purpose?
In conclusion Dr. Minch stated in his opinion the skull was carved by hand due to the irregularity of the
shape of the skull. One side of the cranium was wider than the other, the front teeth or Maxilla area was "crooked" it angled to the skulls left. This he said was also due to hand carving as a machine would have cut the skull evenly.
I was amazed at how much Dr. Minch had gleamed from his 2 hour examination. I am so happy he took the time and honored to have his opinion. He agreed to allow me to print my results of his examination only if I just used the information and state there was absolutely no mention made as to age of the skull or the date of the carving. I agreed.
I thanked Dr. Minch and he left. Dr. Corbett ask if we would like to take the skull to his lab where students would like to see the skull also. Pictures were taken and I explained what I knew about the skull. It was evident there was a class in progress so Phyllis and I took out leave.
What an honor to be privileged to such knowledgeable scientist. All I was and am looking for is the truth.
MY OPINION;
When the Mitchell Hedges
Skull came under scrutiny they said it was impossible to carve against
the grain of the quartz crystal. Also, the jaw would have been broken
when separated from the skull as many skull carvers have tried an
failed. So they then said, " Grinding Wheels left marks with particles
of some fine abrasive was found. Therefore it can't be an Ancient Skull
because we didn't have grinding wheels until way after their
civilizations were gone." The examples of the alleged
Ancient Skulls they did Certify had been uneven, hand done, carving with no polishing
marks, but not viewed under an electron microscope. The results of some of the examinations were not released. There was no explanation as to how the ancient carvers could have done it, they said,
"300 years of rubbing with sand to get this!"
The issue for me is ancient discoveries of Obsidian Disc were unearthed in Egypt that
were roughly dated to 5,000 years old with " GRINDING WHEEL MARKS!"
How could that be? You just don't hear about it. No one can explain how
this skull was done. Ancient potters had wheels they turned by there
"FEET! or WATER" and why go the the trouble anyway? Why the almost perfect
detail?
So, now they say, the
Aztec, Mayan, Olmecs could not have the technology to accomplish this
fine a carving. Well how about "asking them!" They all say they crystal
skulls were given to them by some God entity from the Stars! We, Science,
can't allow that, with Stone Hedge, Great Pyramids etc. all out there
for us to see, it's time for the next evolution in thinking. Think for
yourself!
Iron Oxide layer between first two layers in skull.
My humble point is I
feel there were Civilizations here on Earth for hundreds of thousands of
years that had technology far advanced than our own and not using fossil fuels. THEY could have
used the properties of quartz and the Sacred Geometry of the human skull
form to CONTACT US! Like the Crop circles, they are trying to
communicate to the common man not the ones in power. Quartz will last forever, with the
information still contained inside.
Notice layering on skull surface. This makes machine grinding no possible in my opinion.
This is just my
thinking, do you agree or disagree, I might be just a "Common man" but I
am not a fool. Compassion has 3 separate sections fused together under
extreme heat and pressure, then carved to leave a fantastic Iron Oxide
Occlusion sheet right in he middle of her skull. Marks that reach the
surface
fractures you can feel with your fingernail mean, to me, and I have done
some lapidary work with grinding wheels, she would have been destroyed
and is today very fragile.
Keep in mind, it's not the skull, the sacred geometry of a skull gets our attention but it's the message that is the important thing it's here to share with us. All SKULLS ARE SPECIAL AND HAVE SOMETHING FOR US.
Joseph.
Scientific Examination
